Re: Notification, part II
Rich at Whidbey Telecom <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:31:21 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.exiscan.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If you quarantine the messages, you can audit them and generate custom reports. :) In our case, we generate summary reports and graphs, at the same time we purge older, expired messages: http://www.whidbey.com/mailcenter/stats/stats-virus-7.jpg We tried using a per-virus notification for a while, but users disliked the idea, especially when some were being sent 30+ viruses a day. Instead, feedback told us to either quietly take care of the messages, or, to send users a summary report. On a side note, many providers block outbound port 25 connections from their dynamic pools. Here are some that do so: MindSpring, BellSouth, MSN, NetZero, People PC, Comcast, Sprynet, Cox, Sympatico.ca, EarthLink, Verio, Flashnet, Verizon, MediaOne As this practice gains popularity, to cut spam-relay trojans and viruses, one expects that new variants will rely less on their own SMTP engines. Rich Sandberg [email protected] Whidbey Telecom Network Operations On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:33 AM, Manuel Giorgini wrote: > > Well first of all I would like to thank everyone so kind to reply to my > message. I didn't notice that my replies would not be forwarded to the > list, and that I should manually insert the list address for that to > happen, so I apologize for having started private threads out of your > replies... > > Secondly I didn't know that audit and receipt requests would be > broadcast > to each list member. Again I am sorry for any inconvenience. I turned > them > off. > > > As for the message topic, I think I haven't made myself clear enough > about > my intent. I am quite aware of the fact that sending notifications to > senders of infected mail is very close to useless, mostly because > nowadays > sender addresses are forged. If I mentioned that, it was just to give a > correct image of amavis' capabilities. However I still find some > usefulness > on admin and recipient notifications and I would like to know if this > can > be arranged with exiscan. > > To be even clearer, this is my scenario. > > 1. A message comes, from wherever, to one of our local users. > > 2. This message has a virus. > > 3. Exiscan/clamd/exim intercept it and block further delivery, > however, the > local user and I would like to be notified about it. > > Amavis allows such notifications, and one of our customers explicitly > asked > us to use them for their company. > > Can I arrange something of this sort with exiscan? > > > Thanks in advance for your attention. > > > Cordialità / Best regards / Gxis la > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > Manuel Giorgini <[email protected]>, Programmatore > INTERLOGICA e-business solutions - http://www.interlogica.net > Via Fusinato, 27 - IT 30171 Mestre VE - Italia - Unione Europea > Tel +39 041 099 30 00 (6 linee r.a.) - Fax +39 041 504 11 72 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > > >