Re: Notification, part II
"Edgar Lovecraft" <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:37:55 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.exiscan.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <jbm.20041221163755.0ba2801d@User21> |
Rich at Whidbey Telecom wrote: > > .[snip]... > > On a side note, many providers block outbound port 25 connections from > their dynamic pools. Here are some that do so: > > MindSpring, BellSouth, MSN, NetZero, People PC, Comcast, Sprynet, Cox, > Sympatico.ca, EarthLink, Verio, Flashnet, Verizon, MediaOne > Comcast and Cox may SAY they block outbound tcp port 25, but I have plenty o' proof that neither do entirely, for one, my Cox highspeed connection has no problems using tcp 25 to any where I wish, also my SMTP logs show that neither block very much if at all. > > As this practice gains popularity, to cut spam-relay trojans and > viruses, one expects that new variants will rely less on their own SMTP > engines. > .[snip]... > I just wish that all providers would block/filter outbound SMTP connections over tcp port 25 for any dynamically allocated customer space. -- --EAL-- --