Re: SA-exim issue or SA issue?
Sander Smeenk <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:59:34 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Jason Lixfeld ([email protected]): > Secondly, I think this is more about clarification for me: I see > some cases where the X-First-Run-Spamscore and the score in the X- > Spam-Status are different. Besides what Jonathan Armitage wrote, the 'X-First-Run-Spamscore'-header is not a header i have ever seen in the years i'm running sa-exim. Are you sure you are using sa-exim, and not the exiscan patch? (of which i have absolutely no knowledge) Regards, Sander. -- | "Weird. It doesn't need a license if you change 5 bytes at 0x8cec94 to 0x90!" | -- Someone on IRC about licensed software | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D