Re: SA-exim issue or SA issue?

Sander Smeenk wrote:
> Quoting Jason Lixfeld ([email protected]):
> 
>> Secondly, I think this is more about clarification for me:  I see  
>> some cases where the X-First-Run-Spamscore and the score in the X- 
>> Spam-Status are different.
> 
> Besides what Jonathan Armitage wrote, the 'X-First-Run-Spamscore'-header
> is not a header i have ever seen in the years i'm running sa-exim. Are
> you sure you are using sa-exim, and not the exiscan patch? (of which i
> have absolutely no knowledge)
> 

Sorry, my first reply wasn't clear. What I meant to say was that I'd 
never seen it either, so I really didn't understand the question, but 
was guessing that sa-exim on his two MXs inserts different headers.

Perhaps Jason could let the list know if he's satisfied with the 
answers. I don't think they will help him much if he is using exiscan.

Jon