Re: Exim 4.100-RC2 released

On Sun, Aug 9, 2026 at 3:19 PM Andreas Metzler via Exim-users <
[email protected]> wrote:

> [selective quoting undone]
> On 2026-08-07 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On 2026/08/07 1:13 PM, Mike Cardwell via Exim-users wrote:
> > > It looks like you don't accept LLM submissions, but I pointed Claude at
> > > 4.100 and asked it to find problems that have been introduced since
> > > 4.99.
>
> > That's directly operating in bad faith.
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I do not get this, Mike was using Claude to check for regressions in
> 4.100 compared to 4.99. Isn't it normal even recommended best practice
> to check for regressions?
>
> cu Andreas
>

I think the issue was perhaps in the way he communicated it.
If I found a bug I'd communicated it to the Devs first, not publicly.

-- 
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223
 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS.
"Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-)
[How to ask smart questions:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

-- 
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##   https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
##   [email protected]
## Exim details at https://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - https://code.exim.org/exim/wiki/wiki