Re: mh.tcl bug report and hopefully identification.
"Klaus Elsbernd" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exmh.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hallo [email protected] said: > Hmm - this proposed fix doesn't make sense to me. However, your stack trace > implies that "seq" has the value 5278-5285, that that variable is an input > parameter and should be the name of a sequence. I can't see where "seq" is > changed by anything (at least in my code) Within my patch I later send to the list, the lines, were seq is changed are marked as to be changed. The name seq is replaced by realseq, so that resolves the redefinition. See line 627,629 of mh.tcl, were seq is rewritten and to be changed in the current tar-ball, and the use in line 647, which created the log. Same on 656 and 659, although in those lines the code doesn't produces errors, because seq isn't used any more. Bis dann Klaus -- "Sure, vi is user friendly. It's just particular about who it makes friends with." ;-) _________________________ Klaus Elsbernd; System Administrator, BOFH | [email protected] Deutsches Forschungsz. für Künstliche Intelligenz | DFKI GmbH, Geb. 57/285 67657 Kaiserslautern; Germany | Tel: (+49) 0631/205-3486
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 286 B)
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: 2.6.3ia iQCVAwUBPo1AM2rOJahe3R7NAQFUvgP/b2ZLRozC3s/1u7ZSTuDVTre3adj3tqtG p42T/EepDox2I9+35/cMSZsBbtMoM9ENn4l6Zip1LwjaUB8QfiHxVD31xE1nvN/o fxAXGPdEBomJ0AKvve48cPL1Ji6dCAMYRHuGCYmE4oevU3Y6jpQSFh24NBhgNn0A Ja60AWZRpR4= =SVUN -----END PGP MESSAGE-----