Hmm.. what *should* happen with RFC2369 List-FOO headers?
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exmh.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Let's say you're on a mailing list that adds rfc2369 List-foo headers. exmh nicely adds the List... meny for you. Now let's say that you forward a mail as a message/rfc822 attachment. Should the 2369 headers do anything interesting when displaying the message/rfc822? My gut feeling is it should do one of: 1) Nothing (the current default) 2) Put up the List... menu (could be funky if the msg is a re-forward of another msg/822, so there's multiple List-foo headers. 3) Add the entries to the right-mouse list, along with "show full headers" and "extract into current folder" and stuff like that. Opinions?
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 226 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE+zpBccC3lWbTT17ARAturAJ9FchROlNN94YBhpED1k3CMijofQwCeMMjv ssQ7T5JMhEKokk25VihtzTY= =h6Sb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----