Re: Hmm.. what *should* happen with RFC2369 List-FOO headers?
Hal DeVore <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exmh.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> On Fri, 23 May 2003, "vk" == [email protected] wrote: vk> 1) Nothing (the current default) I'm OK with "nothing". I'd lump it in with replying. You wouldn't want the prog to reply to addresses in a forwarded message. The "extract into current folder" would make the headers "accessible". My 2 miniscule currency units --Hal