Re: Seperate Msg Window
Chris Garrigues <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:41:02 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exmh.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:27:29 -0500 > > Generalizing the 'separate msg/clip' code into one should probably be fairly > straightforward. Among other things, this would mean that a 'clip' window > would get all the other buttons in addition to "dismiss". > > What semantics do people think would be nice for "multiple messages"? > I'm thinking "left click -> open in current/default window" and "right click -> > open in new window". Anybody have other semantics they'd like to see? In the spirit of exmh, it should (of course) be configurable. I've actually been imagining a right click bringing up the sequences menu. I think I'd like either a control click or a shift click opening in a new window. What do other email programs use? If there's consensus, we should make that the default. > I prefer separate windows - any votes for a Mozilla-style tabbed interface? I'd like to see it, but I don't know if I'd like it. (For years I've wanted to display the mutipart/alternative options as tabs, but it's never been important enough to implement.) > Anybody see "multiple ftoc" as useful? Of late, I've been seeing more and > more times when 2 related threads will get going on different lists - but > without cross-posts. I think it would be. There are times that I'd like to leave a given ftoc window up so I can see new messages arrive while I'm also doing real work in another ftoc. I wouldn't use it every day, but I'd use it often enough to be of value. Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 http://www.trinsics.com Would you rather proactively pay for uptime or reactively pay for downtime? Trinsic Solutions Your Proactive IT Management Partner _______________________________________________ Exmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 235 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.2_20000822 06/23/2000 iD8DBQFB5uruK9b4h5R0IUIRAsiPAJ4mWl5Ni4InCV/+qaOTFIzpwDxJxgCeKdbp hrDF5mVPiyGlAZIAQc4P3ps= =qq2G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----