Re: Background flist sometimes misses folders?

Yeah, I think we can simply fix this to get it right.
I thought I understood the issue, and that invalidating
the per-folder cache for the current folder when you made
changes was sufficient.  It may also work to special case
the current folder, hmm...

>>>Sean Kamath said:
 > 
 > 
 > [In a message on Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:50:43 CST,
 >   Chris Garrigues wrote:]
 > >> As noted, this kills me as I have billions of folders with
 > >> things in the unseen sequence.
 > >...
 > >Maybe we need to add a preferences item for "incorrect unseen sequence 
 > >behavior for people who have too many unseen messages"?
 > >
 > >I'm only about 20% joking about this.  It should probably be in 
exmh-defaul
     ts 
 > >instead of preferences so it's minimally visible.  Any ideas what it 
should
      be
 > >called?
 > 
 > Wouldn't it make more sense to have an option in Inc to call
 > Mh_SequenceUpdate? Or, if Inc is set to any form of background task,
 > shouldn't it just call this anyway?
 > 
 > Am I missing something?
 > 
 > Sean
 > 
 > 

--
Brent Welch
Software Architect, Panasas Inc
Accelerating Time to Results(tm) with Clustered Storage

www.panasas.com
[email protected]