Re: Background flist sometimes misses folders?

I believe I've found the typo in my original FlistUncache fix
that meant it wasnt' really clearing the cache.  I've also added
more calls to this from mh.tcl code.  This is all at the CVS HOL.

If someone would prefer just a patch against, e.g., 2.7.2, let me know.

>>>Brent Welch said:
 > 
 > Yeah, I think we can simply fix this to get it right.
 > I thought I understood the issue, and that invalidating
 > the per-folder cache for the current folder when you made
 > changes was sufficient.  It may also work to special case
 > the current folder, hmm...
 > 
 > >>>Sean Kamath said:
 >  > 
 >  > 
 >  > [In a message on Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:50:43 CST,
 >  >   Chris Garrigues wrote:]
 >  > >> As noted, this kills me as I have billions of folders with
 >  > >> things in the unseen sequence.
 >  > >...
 >  > >Maybe we need to add a preferences item for "incorrect unseen 
sequence
 >  > >behavior for people who have too many unseen messages"?
 >  > >
 >  > >I'm only about 20% joking about this.  It should probably be in 
 > exmh-defaul
 >      ts 
 >  > >instead of preferences so it's minimally visible.  Any ideas what it 
 > should
 >       be
 >  > >called?
 >  > 
 >  > Wouldn't it make more sense to have an option in Inc to call
 >  > Mh_SequenceUpdate? Or, if Inc is set to any form of background task,
 >  > shouldn't it just call this anyway?
 >  > 
 >  > Am I missing something?
 >  > 
 >  > Sean
 >  > 
 >  > 
 > 
 > --
 > Brent Welch
 > Software Architect, Panasas Inc
 > Accelerating Time to Results(tm) with Clustered Storage
 > 
 > www.panasas.com
 > [email protected]
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > Exmh-workers mailing list
 > [email protected]
 > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers
 > 
 > 

--
Brent Welch
Software Architect, Panasas Inc
Accelerating Time to Results(tm) with Clustered Storage

www.panasas.com
[email protected]