Re: Exmh-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 4

The patch would be to bogo.tcl, adding the "-" to lines 46 and 47, as follows.

     46             set bogo(spamprog) {sa-learn --spam - }
     47             set bogo(hamprog) {sa-learn --ham - }

I hope a new version of exmh will come out soon.  It is a wonderful
program, and I use it on a Mac PowerBook G4 running OS X v 10.4.9,
in preference to Mac Mail.  My only real complaint is that
the reply function is still not ideal for handling mime.  Nmh handles
reply better because it reads, in the .mh_profile, the mha-edit module
from MHonArc to strip out mime and provide flat text.  For reasons
I do not understand, exmh does not seem to be able to read the line
in the .mh_profile file.  Here, for example, is mine,

repl: -annotate -editor mha-mhedit -format -nocc me.  When I use
exmh's reply, here is a bit of what appears in the reply message template:

 > --===============0227219973==
 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
 > MIME-Version: 1.0
 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 > Content-Description: Exmh-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 4
 > 
 > Send Exmh-users mailing list submissions to
 > 	[email protected]
 >.

None of the first five lines appear when using nmh in an xterm
window.  I can use "cite selection" to get around this issue, but it is
a bit more time consuming.  The only other problem I have noted
with exmh is that it has trouble with emails that are heavily
laden with html, particularly if the message is dense with
graphics and/or uses exotic fonts.  

>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:00:27 EDT, [email protected] 
said:

> 1.	Exmh-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 4	(text/plain) Send Exmh-users mailing
> list submissions to
> 	[email protected]

> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users or, via email, send a
> message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	[email protected]

> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	[email protected]

> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
> Contents of Exmh-users digest..."

> 2.	Today's Topics (2 messages)	(text/plain) Today's Topics:

>    1. RE: Exmh-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1  (Hardy, Matthew)
>    2. Re: Exmh-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1 ([email protected])

> 3.		(multipart/digest) 3.1.	RE: Exmh-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1	(message/
> rfc822) Subject: RE: Exmh-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1 To: "Discussion list
> for EXMH users" <[email protected]> From: "Hardy, Matthew"
> <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:07:41 -0400

> 	(text/plain) Thanks very much.  I figured out that this had to be done to
> the bogo.tcl file in the exmh library.  The error message no longer occurs.
> Thanks much to you and Mr. Mason!

> -----Original Message----- From: Justin Mason [mailto:[email protected]]  Sent:
> Monday, June 18, 2007 5:20 PM To: Discussion list for EXMH users Subject: Re:
> Exmh-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1 

> [email protected] writes:
> What happens if you specify spamprog as "sa-learn --spam -" instead, so
> the '-' gets added in that way?  It's sub-optimal, but if it manages to
> work hackishly, we'll have both a work-around and better understanding of the
> exact issue.

> That sounds plausible, I think....

> --j.

> 3.2.	Re: Exmh-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1	(message/rfc822) Subject: Re:
> Exmh-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1 To: Discussion list for EXMH users
> <[email protected]> From: [email protected] Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007
> 20:38:22 -0400

> 	(multipart/signed)
>  Query keyserver  NOTE: old default options file `/Users/hardy/.gnupg/
> options' ignored Signature made Tue Jun 19 20:38:22 2007 EDT using DSA key ID
> B4D3D7B0 Can't check signature: public key not found

> 	(text/plain) On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:07:41 EDT, "Hardy, Matthew" said:
> Thanks very much.  I figured out that this had to be done to the
> bogo.tcl file in the exmh library. 

> What exactly did you change?  I probably should stuff it into the master CVS
> repository once we figure out what the general fix should be.

> Maybe we get lucky, and for all versions of sa-learn, specifying the
> additional '-' is both safe and correct.  Anybody familiar enough with
> sa-learn to know if that's the case?  If not, we'll probably have to do some
> sort of version-detection.  Yee. Hah.

> 4.	Digest Footer	(text/plain) _______________________________________________
> Exmh-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/
> listinfo/exmh-users