Re: replying to text/plain base64

On 16 October 2007 at 8:13, Neil W Rickert <[email protected]> wrote:

> Kevin Cosgrove <[email protected]> wrote on Oct 15, 2007:
> >On 13 October 2007 at 8:34, Neil W Rickert <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >> I manually include into the reply message, from "@".  If your
> >> configuration is for exmh to put the message into "@" (and not to
> >> have it a symlink to the original message), then it will contain the
> >> decoded text.

All of what you've advised me works just as you said it would.  Now I 
think I'm getting into the area where you said you're not quite as 
expert, that is how to get "sedit" to use "@".  It seems that my 
replies now put decoded text into "@", but "sedit" doesn't contain 
decoded text.

Anyone know where to go from here?

Thanks very much Neil for your help!

> >Do you know how I configure exmh to put the message into "@" instead 
> >of symlinking?  I checked, and it does symlink back to the original 
> >message.
> 
> Preferences -> Quoting
> 
> The unset "Only symlink"
 
--
Kevin