Re: Last-Modified HTTP header from mod_dav_svn
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:57:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel,gmane.mail.eyebrowse.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <87hda0o37o.fsf__41085.3417976343$1132951961$gmane$org@Astalo.kon.iki.fi> |
Erik Huelsmann <[email protected]> writes: > On 9/15/05, Sergey Proskurnya <[email protected]> wrote: >> This will allow to use Internet Caching (Squid) >> very effectively, which will result in lower traffic and >> performance improvement for remote users, who are using >> casual HTTP browser to access to SVN repository. > It's a great idea, but won't work. Currently Subversion requests > REPORTs from the server. These are unique for every single session > between a client and a server. Thus, the REPORT response we're using > isn't cacheable. However, if a "casual HTTP browser" contacts a Subversion repository, it will be using GET, which could be cacheable. On the other hand, mod_dav_svn is already generating ETag headers, and an HTTP/1.1 cache can put the entity tag in an If-None-Match request header, and presumably get back a 304 Not Modified status, in the same way it would with Last-Modified and If-Modified-Since. I suppose there could be two advantages with reporting Last-Modified in addition to ETag: - Perhaps some older caches support Last-Modified but not ETag. - A cache can guess an expiry date based on how long the resource has already been unmodified. - RFC 2616 section 13.3.4 says servers SHOULD do so.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 188 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDh3rZHm9IGt60eMgRAuNfAKDGaXm63hvcYu+XqfloPddyiu5gUQCg0Lw5 z5gHv9eZpVfz2xft00xYTsQ= =88S4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----