Re: To VERH or not to VERH?

Matt Simpson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.ezmlm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 5:11 PM 1/19/07, David I. Bell wrote:
>  Do most people use VERH to change the TO: field to the
>recipient's name or do most people leave the list name in the TO: field?

I leave  the list name in the TO: field, but I add a List-Unsubscribe 
header and use VERH to put the recipient address in that.

>
>Anyone care to weigh in with advantages and disadvantages of each approach?

Advantage of List name in the TO: field is that it seems more 
"correct".  The message was not sent to a single individual; it was 
sent to a group; and the recipient should be aware of that.   Having 
the list name also makes it easier for the recipient to filter list 
mail, although a Sender header could work for that.

Only advantage I see to using VERH in the TO field is to get around 
moronic spam filters that don't like mail that isn't addressed to the 
recipient.  I don't think that's a good basis for blocking mail, and 
I wouldn't be sympathetic to any subscriber who was behind such a 
filter..
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.