Re: Inexpensive anti-spamware/anti-verminware tactic
[email protected] Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:39:31 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.im2000 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:39:47PM +0000, Jon Ribbens wrote: > [email protected] wrote: > > > Err, yeah, they have to pay for the outgoing mail instead. > > > > Presently, they have to store/queue both outgoing and incoming mail. > > No, they have to store as-yet-undelivered outgoing mail, which is a > completely different thing. You do not think there is a significant difference between queuing (delivering) outgoing messages in the present system and under im2000? Mate -- --- Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html