New subscriber has questions
Antone Roundy <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:52:52 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.im2000 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, Just subscribed yesterday, and I have a few questions: * Is this mailing list active? * Are there any existing implementations on IM2000? * If so, how many users does it have? * If "nothing in the recipient notification that reaches the recipient MUA is directly specified as part of the message by the message originator", how does the recipient determine whether to request message headers or the entire message? If requesting "summary headers" is the answer, then how is that superior to including the summary headers in the notification (and perhaps imposing hard limits on how much data that can include)? * If the "no headers in the notification" concept sticks, will it be possible to request summary headers over the existing connection when receiving a notification? (If you're going to request summary headers for every message anyway, which I imagine many will, it would be nice to be able to avoid the overhead of setting up another connection every time to do it). * Going a little farther than the previous, would it be possible to automatically request the entire message over the notification connection (which you'd only do from known trusted senders of course)? * When requesting summary headers or entire messages, can the requesting software indicate in its request that it's an automated request vs. a request made in response to a user action (so that the sender will be able to tell the difference between their message having been read...or at least noticed and downloaded intentionally...and having simple been retrieved but perhaps not seen by human eyes)? * Can a message sender indicate an expiration time after which the message will be deleted from their store? (If so, I'd suggest the timestamp be TRANSMITTED as "seconds from now" to avoid ambiguity over timezones or computers with their clocks set wrong.) * If the spam-deterrent built in to IM2000 is based on shifting costs to senders, is it expected that the STORAGE cost would provide sufficient deterrent, or that the storage + DELIVERY cost would be the deterrent. It seems to me that storage costs alone might not be much deterrent -- after all, you could store one message and send 10 billion notifications about it. You could even use different message IDs for each recipient but have some way to tell that they're the same message (eg. start all of the IDs with "1234567890" and tack on "asdf" for one recipient, "qwerty" for another, etc. * Is there a provision for requesting something like a captcha in order to get greylisted and get your notifications delievered? I'm feeling the pain of SMTP right now, so I've got a little fire in my belly, and the only cure is more cowbell...er, replacing SMTP: http://antone.geckotribe.com/alpha-gecko/anybody-wanna-join-me-in-a-day-without-email-smtp/ Antone Roundy