Re: Hashcash for IM2000

Ricardo SIGNES <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.im2000
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> [2003-09-05T21:07:59]
> D. J. Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > Depends what you mean by ``large.'' One-hour hashcash is comparable to
> > one-penny postage.
> 
> With the sidenote that monetary inflation makes one-penny postage cheaper much
> less quickly than CPU power "inflation" makes a given hashing problem
> "cheaper".
> 
> I still prefer djb's IM2000/postage ideas over hashcash and other proposed
> ideas.

Agreed, largely for that reason -- especially since the proposer of
hashcash is not pushing for one-hour postage, but one-second postage.
86,400 spam messages a day still strikes me as too many.

Disclaimer: I have no idea how many messages a batch of spam usually
includes.

-- 
rjbs
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/WeVD5IEwYcR13KMRAgKKAJ9hSv7CgYG0A1SYJxNjqAE8LhFjwgCfeqA+
S86BUpULnK7Ig2yCjb88Smo=
=GC+/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.