Re: Hashcash for IM2000
Ricardo SIGNES <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.im2000 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> [2003-09-05T21:07:59] > D. J. Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Depends what you mean by ``large.'' One-hour hashcash is comparable to > > one-penny postage. > > With the sidenote that monetary inflation makes one-penny postage cheaper much > less quickly than CPU power "inflation" makes a given hashing problem > "cheaper". > > I still prefer djb's IM2000/postage ideas over hashcash and other proposed > ideas. Agreed, largely for that reason -- especially since the proposer of hashcash is not pushing for one-hour postage, but one-second postage. 86,400 spam messages a day still strikes me as too many. Disclaimer: I have no idea how many messages a batch of spam usually includes. -- rjbs
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/WeVD5IEwYcR13KMRAgKKAJ9hSv7CgYG0A1SYJxNjqAE8LhFjwgCfeqA+ S86BUpULnK7Ig2yCjb88Smo= =GC+/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----