Re: Building rpms in mock

Sam Varshavchik <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.imap.courier.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Zenon Panoussis writes:

> Yes, but. These legacy considerations create an obstacle
> to courier going forward, getting included in distros and
> gaining a wider user base, while also perpetuating all
> the problems that arise from different user:group and
> uid:gid. So I think it would be correct to say that the
> issue here is not what should be done, but how it should
> be done in order to minimise damage to existing installations.

Agreed that minimizing damages is priority 1.

Having said that: courier's been around for a very long time. If it was  
going to be picked up by distros that ship would've sailed some time ago, I  
think. To my knowledge only Debian packaged it faithfully for some time, but  
the packages tended to be very old, due to Debian's nature. And at some  
point they were not maintained at all. I don't know what the current status  
in Debian is. I do have a recollection that some minor distros packaged it  
some time ago. But those distros are not around any more.

_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQRupkKLJP96aW75pIOKYPgoojZS4gUCZYbgVgAKCRCKYPgoojZS
4kDGAQC0GWj2kLqSh9Pw7YvYqk4gxbPvtYqMSqbP4rFrX377+QEAvHKOc8XqiN+g
b4upB3/FtDWUMbqUi9wQhAqqelDmMA0=
=6gHD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.