Re: No RELAYCLIENT for local mail to be re layed?
Sam Varshavchik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.courier.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alessandro Vesely writes: >> In the control file, you should see 'uautsmtp' if it was set, "usmtp" if not >> set. Here, you see "ulocal". > > > I'm confused. Utilities to send via SMTP usually provide for doing SMTP > AUTH as well. Why then had it been useful to hijack RELAYCLIENT to set the > DKIM-signing domain? They're really one and the same. RELAYCLIENT is a form of authentication. It happens to be based on the sender's IP address. A successful authentication also sets RELAYCLIENT in the environment. The presence of RELAYCLIENT in the environment sets uauthsmtp in the control file. > Probably it is more direct to just sign on ulocal. It is necessary to also > have "local" in enablefiltering. Then, if there's no RELAYCLIENT in > smtpaccess, the message won't be relayed, but having it signed shouldn't > hurt, or would it? It wouldn't even get that far. RCPT TO gets rejected, and the mail does not get accepted. _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRupkKLJP96aW75pIOKYPgoojZS4gUCZkH1cAAKCRCKYPgoojZS 4k9VAP9XASim8+fwVKM7UlSEqHkB3tYzqRxvR0gIfXjtcpbP/AD9FpBqIZ9TOLuH mkKXvBAIi4NoTEtl7x1rMQ7R/EzbFAs= =cHGi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----