Re: How to use port 465 ?
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> Sat, 31 May 2025 13:23:26 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.courier.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 30/05/2025 05:21, Lindsay Haisley wrote: > On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 15:37 -0700, Mike Wright wrote: >> My new ISP blocks port 25 (hard block at network level; no overrides) >> so I have to use 465 instead. (I've never used port 465 before and >> don't know anything about using it.) Port 465 in the firewall has >> been opened. Mail client is Thunderbird. SMTP settings are 465, >> STARTTLS, no authentication. Attempt to send mail eventually times >> out with error :+ > > Port 25 is considered a "server to server" SMTP port, and frequently > blocked for MUA use, especially on public access points, and > increasingly by ISPs. That's historical. 465 was the URL Rendezvous Directory (URD) for Source Specific Multicast (SSM) > The appropriate port for MUA (mail user agent) connection these days is > port 587, considered the "mail submission port", as per RFC-4409. > > See <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4409https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4409> RFC 4409 is obsoleted by RFC 6409. RFC 6409 is modified by RFC 8314: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8314 > Unlike Port 25, use of port 587 requires authentication from the client > end. Port 587 supports TLS natively and STARTTLS as well. Ditto for 465. The point was that a man in the middle can somehow hide the STARTTLS keyword from the SMTP greeting, thereby forcing the user to a cleartext session. Port 465 starts encrypted, like 443 for the web, so you need no STARTTLS, Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users