Re: autoreply bug + enhancement request

Am 02.11.2014 um 14:40 schrieb Paul J Stevens:
>
>
> On 30-10-14 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> DBMail 3.1.17, native autoreplies
>>
>> i just wondered about a reply to "debrapascalibonaro.com@mydomain" while
>> "mydomain" is the postfix setting - the reply to header is just a domain
>> - could we skip try reply to invalid addresses without @?
>>
>> From: Orgasmic Birth <[email protected]>
>> Reply-to: debrapascalibonaro.com
>
> I understand your problem, but debrapascalibonaro.com really is a valid
> address, albeit a local one.

hmm - can we agree that in context of autoreplies unqualified addresses 
don't really count? :-)

>> ____________________________________________
>>
>> BTW:
>>
>> DBMail take some headers into account to not send native replies
>> while "X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All" is missing here and used by
>> facebook as example
>> ____________________________________________
>
>
> X- headers are totally ad-hoc

yes and no, "Precedence" is also a pseudo-standard

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee219609%28v=exchg.80%29.aspx

> Maybe we could setup a configuration
> setting to define a regex or list of regexes to skip auto replies.
>
> src/dm_message.c, send_reply would be the starting point.
>>
>> i see in the database a reply to XING while the original message has
>> these headers - uhm - i thought wer already supress in that case?
>>
>> From: XING <[email protected]>
>> Reply-to: "Keine Antwortadresse " <[email protected]>
>> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
>> ____________________________________________
>>
>> wouldn't it make sense to make the reply-supression headers
>> configuarebale instead hardcoded?
>
> Absolutely. The only suppression that is currently done is for
> Precedence: <bulk|list>, and to prevent a mail-loop between dbmail and
> itself

on the other hand dbmail has a table to prevent loops without any 
headers - wouldn't it make sense to just add the few known pseudo 
standard headers in the existing code and save the burden make it 
configureable that way?

to prevent loops the null-sender-*envelope* (<>) would be the 
standard-way on most sites (the dbmail table itself is a good additional 
thing)

that below should cover almost anything

Precedence: junk
Precedence: bulk
Precedence: list
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: AutoReply
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: OOF

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee219609%28v=exchg.80%29.aspx
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/154718/precedence-header-in-email
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3834#section-5

_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlRei9kACgkQhmBjz394AnlpyACfUsj25cDup9SPv4n9wEYGWCz+
lOcAn1h8M5pxc2131lHy5WKCj2Ef242u
=pB8e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----