Re: autoreply bug + enhancement request

Am 08.11.2014 um 22:32 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> on the other hand dbmail has a table to prevent loops without any
> headers - wouldn't it make sense to just add the few known pseudo
> standard headers in the existing code and save the burden make it
> configureable that way?
>
> to prevent loops the null-sender-*envelope* (<>) would be the
> standard-way on most sites (the dbmail table itself is a good additional
> thing)
>
> that below should cover almost anything
>
> Precedence: junk
> Precedence: bulk
> Precedence: list
> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
> X-Auto-Response-Suppress: AutoReply
> X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
> X-Auto-Response-Suppress: OOF
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee219609%28v=exchg.80%29.aspx
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/154718/precedence-header-in-email
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3834#section-5

uhm - and could we also skip "noreply@" and "do_not_reply@" independent 
of headers? at least "noreply" as local part is known for many years

[email protected]
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlRem3YACgkQhmBjz394Anm9YwCfQ1pYh08nj3CZAVh0UYnQt+Ik
ZyYAn3cuNhKZT7zMJ3fV4z6dZYwhhyqt
=SdRL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----