Re: IMAP TLS after upgrade from 3.1.17 to 3.2.3
Reindl Harald <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:59:34 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.dbmail |
|---|---|
| Organization | the lounge interactive design |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 14.07.2016 um 13:49 schrieb Admin Beckspaced: > Am 12.07.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Admin Beckspaced: >>> i just upgraded dbmail from 3.1.17 to most recent stable 3.2.3 >>> >>> with the old version 3.1.17 i could do an IMAP account setup in >>> thunderbird with SSL/TLS on port 993 >>> >>> with the new version 3.2.3 thunderbird now throws me an error that this >>> connection type is not supported by the IMAP server. >>> if i then switch to STARTTLS on port 143 all is working fine. >>> >>> before i start into debugging this on my server ... >>> >>> is this the expected behavior with the IMAP TLS setup in 3.2.3? >>> is SSL/TLS on port 993 not supported? >>> is STARTTLS on port 143 the only supported encryption? >>> >>> if not ... how can i best debug this issue? what do i need to do to make >>> SSL/TLS on port 993 work again? >> just run a proxy in front of dbmail like dovecot (i guess nearly >> everybody still using dbmail does that for a long time to avoid >> different troubles) >> >> that way dbmail has no need to deal with anything in context of TLS and >> 143 with STATTLS as well as 993 with the wrapper work and the same for >> POP3 >> > just another question: > > you wrote "... everybody still using dbmail ..." > > what do you mean by 'still'? have you switched to another mail server > like dovecot, cyrus, ... me not at the moment but i know people which switched to dovecot due low maintainance the last year and ongoing user complaints > perhaps not satisfied with dbmail? yes and no - my problem is that i built a ton of admin-backends around dbmail and the database schema combined with a lot of automation and so it would not be some easy step > i'm just asking because dbmail is not used by that many system admins. > and i'm also sometimes worried about the future of dbmail :( > i'm actually quite happy with dbmail and have been for the last couple > of years. > > but i'm always looking for other peoples insights ;) what's your thought > on the current status of dbmail and its future? i hope it will get more love in a forseeable future.... _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 181 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAleHfqYACgkQhmBjz394Anl0qACdGkVAq0Up5IIH482RtxFjsJeS adsAnjwm+UyO1zM87kuXmsfbPlH/48FC =8WB7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----