Re: IMAP TLS after upgrade from 3.1.17 to 3.2.3
Reindl Harald <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:13:30 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.dbmail |
|---|---|
| Organization | the lounge interactive design |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 14.07.2016 um 13:57 schrieb Ken Drummond: > On 14-07-16 6:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 12.07.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Admin Beckspaced: >>> i just upgraded dbmail from 3.1.17 to most recent stable 3.2.3 >>> >>> with the old version 3.1.17 i could do an IMAP account setup in >>> thunderbird with SSL/TLS on port 993 >>> >>> with the new version 3.2.3 thunderbird now throws me an error that this >>> connection type is not supported by the IMAP server. >>> if i then switch to STARTTLS on port 143 all is working fine. >>> >>> before i start into debugging this on my server ... >>> >>> is this the expected behavior with the IMAP TLS setup in 3.2.3? >>> is SSL/TLS on port 993 not supported? >>> is STARTTLS on port 143 the only supported encryption? >>> >>> if not ... how can i best debug this issue? what do i need to do to make >>> SSL/TLS on port 993 work again? >> >> just run a proxy in front of dbmail like dovecot (i guess nearly >> everybody still using dbmail does that for a long time to avoid >> different troubles) >> >> that way dbmail has no need to deal with anything in context of TLS >> and 143 with STATTLS as well as 993 with the wrapper work and the same >> for POP3 > > I am in a similar position I have been running dbmail 3.1.17 and using > imap with SSL/TLS on port 993 for a few years now. Just for my own use > on a home gentoo server. I am upgrading the hardware and thought I'd > take the opportunity to use dbmail to 3.2.2. However, in my testing > there seems to be no way to access IMAP on port 993 with SSL/TLS. > > (Sorry to sound rude but) Rather than telling me to use a different > proxy, could someone confirm that SSL/TLS access on port 993 which > worked on 3.1.17 does NOT and CANNOT work using 3.2.2 (without using > some other proxy) sorry to sound rude but in the current support situation making a dbmail major upgrade to 3.2 is somehow crazy and there where so much problems with TLS and haning services in the past years with 3.0/3.1 that it's a widely accepted recommendation to run it behind a proxy and if it's only for security resons because dovecot makes the authetication based on the dbmail database directly with the client and until that was successful no single bit of a arbitary client passes to dbmail guess where security bugs more likely and quicker fixed - dbmail or dovecot - look at the release freqency and userbase and you know _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 181 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAleHgeoACgkQhmBjz394Anmq9wCeMUL5cBArVhsYL1y86BzImn6K DXEAmwSTjrFcOZKl0MJWRABOcPHWDwMq =qPZb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----