Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tim Showalter <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Mar 2015 01:39:32 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/10/15 7:23 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > And I agree completely, although I did try to convince him that 9600 bps was perhaps a reasonable compromise. And I would bet you were unsuccessful in this, much to Mark's glee. Mark had some unusual opinions, but he had pretty good reasons for them. Well, except using NIL in C programs, that's just weird. We are all worse off for the loss of him. Tim _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol