Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?

David Harris writes:
> Don't get me wrong - there are things I absolutely *loathe* 
> about IMAP (implied part 
> numbering in bodystructures being the biggest one), but it's 
> what we've got: I for 
> one have negative enthusiasm for spending another ten years in 
> bitter arguments 
> over some slightly "improved" replacement.

We're going to get it, though. There have been a few high-profile 
gmail-only IMAP client launches in the past few years, and now Gmail has a 
JSON-based prototocol that'll be simpler to use than IMAP for many people.

Quite agree about the implied part numbering.

Arnt

_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol