Re: [Imap-protocol] Gmail flags issue, timing-sensitive

Michael M Slusarz <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:21:19 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.mail.imap.general
Message-ID <20150325132119.Horde.H9br3-icKPf32c5xmMNhdfM@bigworm.curecanti.org>
Quoting Kostya Vasilyev <[email protected]>:

> New state reported without \Answered first (wrong), then with it (right),
> and the MODSEQ is the same (which is also wrong).
>
> 21:54:31.077 [IMAP.5800] Sending: kman25 UID STORE 196290 +FLAGS (\Flagged)
> 21:54:31.672  [IMAP_RAW.5800] Data is <167>:
> 21:54:31.672  * 20927 FETCH (FLAGS (\Flagged \Seen) MODSEQ (20736711) UID
> 196290)
> 21:54:31.672 * 20927 FETCH (UID 196290 MODSEQ (20736711) FLAGS (\Answered
> \Flagged \Seen))
> 21:54:31.672  kman25 OK Success

This is inefficient.  But it is perfectly acceptable IMAP.

michael

_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol