Re: [Imap-protocol] Gmail flags issue, timing-sensitive
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:30:50 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Michael, On 25/03/2015 19:21, Michael M Slusarz wrote: > Quoting Kostya Vasilyev <[email protected]>: > >> New state reported without \Answered first (wrong), then with it >> (right), >> and the MODSEQ is the same (which is also wrong). >> >> 21:54:31.077 [IMAP.5800] Sending: kman25 UID STORE 196290 +FLAGS >> (\Flagged) >> 21:54:31.672 [IMAP_RAW.5800] Data is <167>: >> 21:54:31.672 * 20927 FETCH (FLAGS (\Flagged \Seen) MODSEQ (20736711) >> UID >> 196290) >> 21:54:31.672 * 20927 FETCH (UID 196290 MODSEQ (20736711) FLAGS >> (\Answered >> \Flagged \Seen)) >> 21:54:31.672 kman25 OK Success > This is inefficient. But it is perfectly acceptable IMAP. I think this is not correct, because the two responses should use 2 different MODSEQs, if they return different set of flags. _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol