Re: Whether/how to address security issue with Majordomo 1.94.5?
Brent Chapman <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:35:53 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.majordomo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p06210256be55298dda54@[66.92.48.19]> |
At 5:16 PM -0500 3/9/05, John R Levine wrote: > > Someone has contacted me about a security issue with Majordomo 1.94.5 >> (the current release). Essentially, the algorithm used to generate >> cookies for use in "auth" commands is weak and easily reversible. > >They're right, but the main problem is that people often forget to change >the default nonce used to generate them. > >Given the level of the threat, if you simply advise people to change the >nonce, and to use different ones if they have multiple mj1 setups for >different virtual domains, that should be fine. That doesn't appear to be sufficient. The person who contacted me included code which figures out what the nonce (the "cookie_seed" in the Majordomo.cf file) is; the code is only about 40 lines of Perl. >I'd rather put effort into sticking a stake in the ground to ship mj 2.0 >so people will believe that it's a released product. So would I, but I've about given up hope for it ever being released. I'd love to be proven wrong. -Brent -- Brent Chapman <[email protected]> Great Circle Associates, Inc. http://www.greatcircle.com/ +1 650 962 0841