Re: Whether/how to address security issue with Majordomo 1.94.5?

I would not mind moving into the role of release coordinator.
I can think of several of the unofficial patches that could
be rolled in to make a dandy 1.94.6 release, as well as a few
bug and security fixes and "unsupported" utilities. :)

If you do move the development effort to sourceforge, are you
considering any changes to a GNU license?  Would greatcircle
still host the mailing lists?

There were a couple years where I was intimately familiar with
the inner workings of majordomo, and I still have a back burner
project to make majordomo LDAP aware.  I intend to use an on/off
switch for this feature, if I ever get time to finish it. :(

I just don't want to see majordomo die of neglect, and I prefer
the simplicity of 1.9x to the complexity of "][".

Dan Liston

Brent Chapman wrote:

> At 1:57 PM -0800 3/9/05, Brent Chapman wrote:
> 
>> If somebody else wants to step forward and be the new "release 
>> coordinator" (as John Rouillard and Chan Wilson were in the past), 
>> then I'd be happy to distribute the new tarball that they put 
>> together, but I'm not willing to step into that role myself.
>>
>> So, are there any volunteers who can convince me that they're capable 
>> of taking on the role?
> 
> 
> By the way, I wouldn't mind considering moving the whole 
> development/support effort off to Sourceforge, either.
> 
> 
> -Brent