Re: Whether/how to address security issue

At 2:25 PM -0800 3/9/05, Roger B.A. Klorese  wrote:
>Brent Chapman wrote:
>
>>At 1:57 PM -0800 3/9/05, Brent Chapman wrote:
>>
>>>If somebody else wants to step forward and be the new "release 
>>>coordinator" (as John Rouillard and Chan Wilson were in the past), 
>>>then I'd be happy to distribute the new tarball that they put 
>>>together, but I'm not willing to step into that role myself.
>>>
>>>So, are there any volunteers who can convince me that they're 
>>>capable of taking on the role?
>>
>>
>>By the way, I wouldn't mind considering moving the whole 
>>development/support effort off to Sourceforge, either.
>>
>>
>>-Brent
>
>
>By the way, I'd hope anyone who'd consider doing it for Mj1 might 
>consider doing for Mj2...!

Wishful thinking, I think...  They're very different beasts.  I don't 
think _I'm_ qualified to be a release coordinator for Mj2; there's 
too much nitty-gritty know-how required about how to turn it into a 
.rpm, .deb, and so forth, which I don't have.

Mj1 has always simply been distributed as a tarball, and that's fine; 
we shouldn't be looking to break new ground (and attract new users, 
<shudder>) by doing anything different than that with Mj1.

-Brent
-- 
Brent Chapman <[email protected]>
Great Circle Associates, Inc.
http://www.greatcircle.com/
+1 650 962 0841