Re: Enhancement request: additional actions for bounce_rules
"Roger B.A. Klorese" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.majordomo.majordomo2.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael Yount wrote: > One benefit of having a bounce-nomail class is the ability to > communicate delivery problems to people who are experiencing them. By > lumping nomail recipients together, you lose that ability, except at the > time of the delivery class change. > That's a very good point. It would, of course, require a way to notify them. > What advantage does setting delivery to nomail have over unsubscribing, > other than making it easier for a subscriber or owner to resume > delivery? > That's a significant one, when you consider the need to deal with passwords.