Re: Enhancement request: additional actions for bounce_rules
Michael Yount <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.majordomo.majordomo2.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27 Feb 22:54, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote: > The point was that they discriminate between bounce-nomail and > requested-nomail because they see requested-nomail as a permanent > state. One benefit of having a bounce-nomail class is the ability to communicate delivery problems to people who are experiencing them. By lumping nomail recipients together, you lose that ability, except at the time of the delivery class change. What advantage does setting delivery to nomail have over unsubscribing, other than making it easier for a subscriber or owner to resume delivery? Michael