Re: Enhancement request: additional actions for bounce_rules

Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> If you wish to make the same assumptions, then you need to disable 
> inactive_lifetime completely for voluntary nomail.  But that's not 
> all, of course:
> - you need to make reading-by-web more friendly
> - you need to make posting-by-web possible


...which is not to say that I'm requesting that.  (Many of our folk 
would like it a lot, but I'm not going there at the moment.)  The point 
was that they discriminate between bounce-nomail and requested-nomail 
because they see requested-nomail as a permanent state.