Re: Mulberry - the future?
Michel Jouvin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mulberry.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
I have started with Mulberry when it was only in beta... Every attempt
to switch was a failure until I had to use SHA-2 encoded certificates.
This is a killer for Mulberry, unfortunately (Mulberry hanging when
opening a message signed by such a certificate). Thus I had to switch (I
rely very much on certificate for various reasons in my everyday
professional life). I had to switch to Thunderbird, I hate it even after
one year of using it... but it was the less worst client I found on
Windows...
Cheers,
Michel
Le 12/02/2014 20:29, Steven Frysinger a écrit :
> It still works for me. Exchange/Outlook doesn't cut it.
>
> Steve
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Feb 12, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Mike Alexander <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> --On February 12, 2014 4:14:35 PM +0000 Andy Clews <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Congratulations and thanks to Cyrus Daboo for what was a fine piece
>>> of software, that in its day was arguably the best email application
>>> around.
>> For me it still is. I keep trying other programs and coming back to Mulberry. I can use other IMAP clients too if I want to (that's one of the advantages of IMAP), but I use Mulberry most of the time.
>>
>> By the way, you don't need IMSP to store options on a server. I use WEBDAV for that.
>>
>> Mike