Re: Mulberry - the future?

Joel Baldwin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.mulberry.user
Message-ID <C141EFB0C49F6BDFEF9FCD3D@[192.168.56.1]>
I've been using Mulberry every since I switched to it as the mail client
and Opera as the web browser when I could no longer trust Netscape's
pre Mozilla bundle to properly display pages, i.e. a LONG time ago.  I
paid for a copy of both Mulberry and Opera long before they became free.

I'll keep using Mulberry until I can no longer get it to work on my
system, or it doesn't do something I need.  I hope that's a long time
from now, but it may eventually be a dead horse.  I'm starting to consider
Chrome since neither IE11 or Opera will handle the large number of tabs I
like to operate with these days.

nothing lasts forever, especially in electronics :(


--On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:14 PM +0000 Andy Clews 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi (if anyone's there...)
>
> I've just seen Ferdinand von Prondzynski's email (Aug 13 2013) to this
> list, enquiring about the future of Mulberry.  Just thought I'd add my
> penny's worth.
>
> Mulberry had been in use at my institution (University of Sussex, UK) for
> many years (using an IMSP server for preferences and address books), and
> rather like Marmite (other yeast-extract products are available :-) some
> people loved it, some hated it, and many more merely tolerated it.   We
> built up a strong local support resource for it, and wrote many useful
> FAQs for it (see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/faqbrowse?cat_id=17
> while you still can).   We used it while it was commercial, licensed
> software, and continued to use it for years after it became free and open
> source.
>
> Although it was a very complete and robust email client, Mulberry is "of
> its day" and no longer meets my institution's needs.  In Spring 2011 we
> moved to MS Exchange, and Outlook.   Some people love it, some hate it,
> some merely tolerate it... but Outlook and Exchange are undoubtedly
> providing us with a more complete email and calendaring facility, even
> though its support and management can be a nightmare.   Mulberry will
> work with Exchange IMAP, but Exchange doesn't support the IMAP extensions
> used by Mulberry, so the loss of some very useful features, combined with
> a shift of support resources, meant its days were numbered here.
>
> We finally switched off our ageing, slow IMSP server at the end of 2013,
> and apart from one or two local installations of Mulberry (i.e. using
> locally-stored preferences etc), the client is now, sadly, more or less
> dead at my institution.
>
> Congratulations and thanks to Cyrus Daboo for what was a fine piece of
> software, that in its day was arguably the best email application around.
>
> --
> Andy Clews
> Client Services Group,         University of Sussex IT Services
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.