Re: Mulberry - the future?
Joel Baldwin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mulberry.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C141EFB0C49F6BDFEF9FCD3D@[192.168.56.1]> |
I've been using Mulberry every since I switched to it as the mail client and Opera as the web browser when I could no longer trust Netscape's pre Mozilla bundle to properly display pages, i.e. a LONG time ago. I paid for a copy of both Mulberry and Opera long before they became free. I'll keep using Mulberry until I can no longer get it to work on my system, or it doesn't do something I need. I hope that's a long time from now, but it may eventually be a dead horse. I'm starting to consider Chrome since neither IE11 or Opera will handle the large number of tabs I like to operate with these days. nothing lasts forever, especially in electronics :( --On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:14 PM +0000 Andy Clews <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi (if anyone's there...) > > I've just seen Ferdinand von Prondzynski's email (Aug 13 2013) to this > list, enquiring about the future of Mulberry. Just thought I'd add my > penny's worth. > > Mulberry had been in use at my institution (University of Sussex, UK) for > many years (using an IMSP server for preferences and address books), and > rather like Marmite (other yeast-extract products are available :-) some > people loved it, some hated it, and many more merely tolerated it. We > built up a strong local support resource for it, and wrote many useful > FAQs for it (see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/faqbrowse?cat_id=17 > while you still can). We used it while it was commercial, licensed > software, and continued to use it for years after it became free and open > source. > > Although it was a very complete and robust email client, Mulberry is "of > its day" and no longer meets my institution's needs. In Spring 2011 we > moved to MS Exchange, and Outlook. Some people love it, some hate it, > some merely tolerate it... but Outlook and Exchange are undoubtedly > providing us with a more complete email and calendaring facility, even > though its support and management can be a nightmare. Mulberry will > work with Exchange IMAP, but Exchange doesn't support the IMAP extensions > used by Mulberry, so the loss of some very useful features, combined with > a shift of support resources, meant its days were numbered here. > > We finally switched off our ageing, slow IMSP server at the end of 2013, > and apart from one or two local installations of Mulberry (i.e. using > locally-stored preferences etc), the client is now, sadly, more or less > dead at my institution. > > Congratulations and thanks to Cyrus Daboo for what was a fine piece of > software, that in its day was arguably the best email application around. > > -- > Andy Clews > Client Services Group, University of Sussex IT Services