Re: Mulberry - the future?

I've been following this with great interest. I am on the med school 
faculty at Columbia, and picked up Mulberry years ago when it was one of 
the Email clients supported by Columbia. (They dropped it when Mulberry 
went under financially, I think.) I am by no means a high powered 
programmer, but am probably more techie than many of my colleagues. Perhaps 
relatedly, I am very comfortable with Mulberry's bare bones approach. It 
suits my needs extremely well, and it is hard for me to imagine switching.

I would be happy to support efforts to keep it going or enhance it, but I'm 
afraid I do not have the technical expertise to provide any hands-on help.
Tim Walsh

--On Thursday, February 13, 2014 11:04 AM -0500 Gleason Pace 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Andy,
>
>
>> Joan Korenman writes:
>
>
>>> I can't tell you how heartened I am to see this thread and know that
>>> there are many other die-hard Mulberry users out there.  Like many of
>>> you, I started using Mulberry when it was a paid program and have never
>>> stopped using it, [...]
>>>
>>> Unlike many folks on this forum, I am not technically proficient.  [...]
>
>> It was interesting to read this, because a lot of people at my
>> place hated Mulberry because they thought it was *not* well suited
>> to folk who were less technically-proficient, and they were only too
>> pleased with the switch to Outlook, which they considered to be much
>> more user-friendly (needless to say, I don't share that view, but
>> I'm paid to provide support for it nevertheless).
>
> Mulberry does seem to benefit from native intelligence of the user.
> Less smart techies might not like it either.
>
>> Andy