Re: Mulberry - the future?
"Joel L. Rosenblatt" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mulberry.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAM+TzrRHQg4-oSX9qXm8zv1=N6dEGyPY_0fDUzx-0utVbajWmQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I used Mulberry for over 12 years and loved it - We have now moved our mail to Google and after much kicking and screaming, have moved to the gmail web interface. It doesn't completely suck, but I do miss some of the really nice Mulberry features I tried to use Mulberry with gmail, but there is a bug in the Gmail imap interface that causes Mulberry to crash if the message has a .eml extension it in Joel Joel Rosenblatt, Director Network & Computer Security Columbia Information Security Office (CISO) Columbia University, 612 W 115th Street, NY, NY 10025 / 212 854 3033 http://www.columbia.edu/~joel Public PGP key http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x90BD740BCC7326C3 On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Gleason Pace <[email protected]> wrote: > > F, > >> I suspect part of the problem that email itself is in decline. A university >> recently did a survey of faculty and student email use and found that, >> between 2008 and 2013, it had declined by nearly 40%. Partly this is a >> student phenomenon: they now use social networking tools and other such >> stuff to communicate. But this overall trend won't help to persuade >> developers to keep niche products in service. > >> Ferdinand > > Yes, that is a big part of the problem. The other thing is that there > remains a niche for high performance email clients. There simply is > no reason to produce email clients for casual users. Zero market > these days for that. > > > -- > Gleason >