Re: Devin's effort
David Lang <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mulberry.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 4/20/2015 9:57 AM, Brian Reid <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have used Mulberry for ages and ages. Because of its imminent >> demise, I've been learning and using Thunderbird in parallel with >> Mulberry for about a year. >> >> Thunderbird can do most things that Mulberry can do, but it is >> clumsy, slow, and more difficult to control. > > Again - just making claims like this without substantiation isn't very > useful. > > Details would be appreciated... > > 1. In what way is it 'clumsy' (compared to Mulberry)? > > 2. Slow? Haven't noticed it - unless you mean after initially adding a > new IMAP account with a lot of folders and emails? In that case, yes, > until it finishes syncing all of that email, it will be slow. Work is > being done to put a lot more of that process in the background, but for > now, it is just recommended to let it finish syncing without trying to > use it much, or, do like I do, and disable offline mode for all but the > folders you really want/need in offline mode. the very fact that it insists on syncing the entire mailstore to the local device rules it out for many of us. David Lang