Re: Devin's effort

--On 12. Mai 2015 06:31:34 -0400 Tanstaafl <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> If Mulberry is performant with large IMAP mailstores, then I guarantee
> you it is caching things, at least to an extent.

Yes, but its control is much more fine-grained. I've attached a screenshot 
of the relevant settings. Please note that my settings are all set to 
unlimited, because I'm on an extremely fast link. But when you are on a 
slow link and choose lower limits, you can still open a mailbox with tens 
of thousands of messages quickly, even if it's for the very first time and 
Mulberry has no cache whatsoever. It only downloads the headers for the 
current view, not for the entire mailbox. Personally I don't need that 
feature anymore, but it was a godsend back in the days of dial-up 
connections.
-- 
    .:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
                 .:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
   .:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-470-89578.:.