Re: Devin's effort

<rant>
I wish you guys would stop sending to me and CC'ing the List.

Apparently your list server is automatically set to not send duplicates,
so when you send to both me and the list, the only one I get is the one
sent direct to me - which breaks 'Reply-To-List'.

I am on the list, so sending to me directly too is useless.

Or - does Mulberry not not have a proper 'Reply-To-List' feature So no
one has ever complained about this?
</rant>

Now on to my reply...

On 5/12/2015 6:44 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn <[email protected]> wrote:
> --On 12. Mai 2015 06:31:34 -0400 Tanstaafl <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> If Mulberry is performant with large IMAP mailstores, then I guarantee
>> you it is caching things, at least to an extent.

> Yes, but its control is much more fine-grained. I've attached a screenshot 
> of the relevant settings. Please note that my settings are all set to 
> unlimited, because I'm on an extremely fast link. But when you are on a 
> slow link and choose lower limits, you can still open a mailbox with tens 
> of thousands of messages quickly, even if it's for the very first time and 
> Mulberry has no cache whatsoever. It only downloads the headers for the 
> current view, not for the entire mailbox. Personally I don't need that 
> feature anymore, but it was a godsend back in the days of dial-up 
> connections.

Interesting, and I understand the argument in context of slow internet
connections, but in this day and age... well, if this is on someone's
short list of required features, I doubt TB will ever officially support
it, since in the modern age, it really isn't useful - if you are on a
slow connection, just use a webmail client.