Re: Mulberry and OSX Catalina

Tanstaafl,

> On Wed Jan 22 2020 13:54:56 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Gleason
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> That was one example.

> I;m sure if I was a Mulberry User I could come up with some features
> that TB has that it doesn't...

> Thats the way it is...

That would be an interesting exercise.  But maybe not significant
because Mulberry design is so unique.

>> Outgoing filters is a common itch with users who want high performance
>> email clients.

> There you go again, speaking for everyone.

No, simply people who use or would like to use programs like Mulberry.

> Sorry. Never had a need for them, and I'm a (very) power user.

>> Maybe Moz is realizing that high performance is the only market left.

> No, they just understand TB has some serious performance issues under
> certain circumstances... and they are/will be addressing them now that
> they have the resources to do so.

>>> Within a year or two, TB will be a different animal - sleek, swift,
>>> powerful and feature rich, with a thriving Addon ecosystem.

>> It's possible.  You hear a lot of rumors about TB.

> Don't need to worry about rumours if you stay in touch.
Rumors there too.

>> One I have heard several times is that Moz was dropping support with
>> no further development. Hasn't happened so far.

> Actually, that did happen, in fact, a long time ago. They discontinued
> all development resources with regard to TB, except that they agreed to
> maintain the build environment, and have done so, ever since.

Hmm, and here I was getting these continuous new Daily Builds the whole
time.

> You shouldn't go around acting like you know everything about everything
> if all you do is listen to rumours.

That would be true regardless of what you listen to.

-- 

Gleason
TheBat! 9.0.16.5 (BETA) Pro (64bit, no OTFE) on Windows 10.0 18363