Re: Acked-by: [was: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] enter.c: Use wmem*() functions with] wide-character strings

On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:02:21AM +0000, Crystal Kolipe via Mutt-dev wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 07:41:16PM -0500, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> > I've never heard of acked-by -- what I just read here is all I know -- but
> > offhand, I think it's overkill for a project of Mutt's moderate size. Two
> > levels of formal review and bookkeeping seems like more than Mutt needs.
> 
> It is an overkill.
> 
> We don't need a rigid framework and policy.  That's part of the advantage of
> moving back to a free-form mailing list development environment.
> 
> The commit messages can just include, "discussed by ...", "tested by ...", or
> whatever is relevant to the size and complexity of the patch.

That's pretty much what I think. The pros given in this thread could not
convince me that it is worth the extra work.

But as Kevin is the only one doing commits right now, it's up to him, I
guess. I would just hate it if I would have to do it.