Re: Re: Searching multiple mailboxes?
Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.pine.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Tim K. (Gmane) wrote: > Try Thunderbird or IMAPSize (great tool for other IMAP purposes too). I see that IMAPSize is a Windows app. I'm on Mac OS X. Hypocritical off-topic rambling: I've tried out Thunderbird before, I can't stand the interface. (My employer's own Mail, before Tiger, is the best GUI mail client I've ever used.. I had issues with it, but I still used it side by side alongside pine all the time. I don't like the way the UI has gone forward, IMHO towards being just like any other GUI mail program in many respects.. GNUMail has largely the old UI but is not usable to me for some other reasons, possibly partially due to weirdnesses of my mail server.) I liked Eudora when I used POP a very very very long time ago, but for some reason it doesn't do IMAP "right" (or at least I don't like the way it does it). I like most other programs' "delete messages then manually expunge" idea. I realize this sounds totally trivial, but sometimes one "little" thing is what pushes one away from any program. I want a GUI mail program that (optionally) showed me the mailbox list on the *right* side of the window. Mail.app used to do that when it used drawers. Actually, I've said it before, but a very very slightly GUI-fied pine would actually come close to my perfect email program. In terms of GUI-fied, I personally would mean optionally show inline images, and optionally VIEW [but not create] HTML messages... and possibly optionally get out of the INDEX/MESSAGE VIEW metaphor so you could have both at one time. Actually, besides inline image viewing (and pine's view externally from message attachments capability is a pretty decent workaround), about the only thing I miss from a GUI mail program is being able to have multiple messages open at the same time. Yeah, I could have multiple pine sessions running in different Terminal windows, but it's not quite the same thing. > pine's search leaves a lot to be desired in my opinion, that's why I always > run both pine and Thunderbird at the same time, each is good at different > things (but probably use pine 90% of the time). Yeah, that's the great thing about IMAP, multiple mail programs at once without hosing your mailbox. _______________________________________________ Pine-info mailing list [email protected] http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info