Re: alpine (was Re: UTF-8?)

"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:01:31 -0600 (CST)

Newsgroups	gmane.mail.pine.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

> We have frozen development on Pine, and our focus is on Alpine which 
> continues the Pine tradition. We will continue to support Pine until it 
> no longer makes sense or is no longer needed, but our plan is to 
> eventually support only Alpine. You can think of Alpine as a version 5 
> Pine without going too far wrong. Besides the unix command-line client 
> there will also be a Windows version like before and a new web-based 
> version.

Sounds interesting.

Hopefully not too late now, but why the Apache Software License Version 
2.0 instead of the simpler and more popular BSD- and MIT-style Apache 
Software License Version 1.1?
_______________________________________________
Pine-info mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info