Re: alpine (was Re: UTF-8?)
Hugh Sheets <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.pine.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > Sounds interesting. > > Hopefully not too late now, but why the Apache Software License Version > 2.0 instead of the simpler and more popular BSD- and MIT-style Apache > Software License Version 1.1? The decision to use the Apache License, Version 2.0 was made nearly a year ago now when the Alpine plan was hatched. We are working on standardizing our license for the several products we offer - it just makes life easier. Since we were already using the Apache License, Version 2.0 for other products (with great success!) it was an easy decision for us. Hugh Sheets Manager, Messaging Solutions Technology Engineering Group Distributed Systems University of Washington _______________________________________________ Pine-info mailing list [email protected] http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info