Re: bayes filters with pine?
Zbigniew Szalbot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.pine.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, S.A. Birl wrote: > What I find interesting is your dilema. You want to filter email, but > do not want to run SpamAssassin because the computer is slow. > > However, as discussed in prior postings, Pine's filtering is slower > and more CPU intensive than, say, procmail. I cannot speak about > SpamAssassin, as I do not run it. But I do run procmail. OK. Thanks. Just to explain. We do a lot of sending through this box but only from a trusted local source. So if we wanted to run spamassin for all outgoing mail, which we know is clean anyway, as it is generated by an automated system from plain text files and data from a database, it would mean a lot of unnecessary overhead. But I do get spam, actually tons of it, and so I am looking for something that can be done per user (as opposite to a system-wide solution). I was reluctant to use procmail, because - frankly - I would just like to plug something in and use it rather than learn a lot how to set it up first. Being curious though, I think I will eventually give procmail a chance ;) Thanks! -- Zbigniew Szalbot _______________________________________________ Pine-info mailing list [email protected] http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info