Re: Reducing KODRETRY

Ryan Barrett <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.pine.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Thorsten Glaser wrote:

>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/csh-whynot/
>
> While I do agree on that, this is not intended as a shell flamewar... I

agreed, -1 to flame wars, but i have to qualify steven's citation.

"CSH Programming Considered Harmful" argues convincingly that csh and friends 
are inappropriate for *programming*, ie writing shell scripts. sadly, it's 
often misused to discourage using csh shells for *any* task, including as 
interactive shells. that's a shame.

i've used tcsh as my interactive shell for a long time. i prefer it due to a 
few features, mostly in its line editor, that give it the edge over bash for 
me. (but yes, i also use and love readline in other programs. :P)

sure, when i have to write non-trivial shell scripts, i turn to bash. i have 
no problem using one shell for scripting and another for interactive, though. 
use the best tool for the job (and for you), right?

-Ryan

--
http://snarfed.org/
_______________________________________________
Pine-info mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.