Re: Bouncing Spam

Bert Driehuis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.pine.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Jason wrote:

> If you're going to do that I would suggest a challenge-response system
> instead, like TMDA.  That way once someone confirms their address they
> never go through that process again.  There's no password to remember to
> include - all they do is respond to the automatic message and they are
> whitelisted indefinitely.  So far I've never had a spammer bother to
> get through TMDA.  It's not worth their trouble and my friends haven't
> had a problem with it either, though I only use it on my more spam-prone
> addresses.

TMDA seems to send a fresh e-mail containing a challenge to the (often 
forged) sender of the spam, contributing to the spam problem.

If one uses TMDA, it would be highly advantageous to also implement SPF 
in paranoid mode. Fortunately, not too many people use TMDA. As soon as 
even just a small percentage of users switch to solutions like TMDA, 
e-mail will simply grind to a halt -- one system will quaranteen the 
others challenges (and, as you may have guessed, my response to that 
situation would be: good riddance :-)

At best, C/R is a stopgap, but even today misdirected C/R challenges 
outnumber legitimate challenges by a vast margin.

The only more-or-less correct way to implement Challenge/Response is to 
do it in-protocol. In other words, to reject the message in SMTP using a 
rejection such as
  5.7.1 Please visit http://cr.example.com/id=123456 to unlock

My perspective may be a bit different than that of many Pine users -- 
I'm Postmaster for a large corporation that operates worldwide, so I get 
to see more crap than most. Due to a significant number of complaints, I 
have already had to block one commercial challenge/response vendor (not 
a tough decision; they were also spamming my users).

Some Postmasters, usually for smaller sites, go one step further and say 
that even a single misdirected challenge is grounds for blacklisting
  -- after all, your spam problem shouldn't have to become their spam 
problem.

There are no easy solutions to the spam problem.
_______________________________________________
Pine-info mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.